Current:Home > InvestWoman files lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting customers' biometric data -TruePath Finance
Woman files lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting customers' biometric data
View
Date:2025-04-27 10:57:40
An Illinois woman has filed a lawsuit accusing Target of illegally collecting and storing her and other customers' biometric data through facial recognition technology and other means without their consent.
The lawsuit, filed March 11 in a Cook County circuit court and published by local outlet Fox 32, alleges Target's surveillance systems covertly collect things like face and fingerprint scans from customers as part of its anti-theft efforts. The alleged practice violates Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act, the lawsuit contends, a law the state legislature passed in 2008 to protect people from details of their physical characteristics being collected without their knowledge.
"Target does not notify customers of this fact prior to store entry, nor does it obtain consent prior to collecting its customers’ Biometric Data," according to the lawsuit.
Target did not immediately respond Tuesday morning to USA TODAY's request for comment.
What is biometric data and how does BIPA protect Illinois residents' privacy?
Biometric information comprises data on a range of a person's physical characteristics, including retina or iris scans, fingerprints, voiceprints, hand scans, facial geometry and DNA.
Illinois' biometric privacy act, better known as BIPA, makes it unlawful for private companies to use facial recognition technology to identify and track such information without people's consent, according to the state's American Civil Liberties Union.
The law also requires companies to specify how the information would be retained and when it would be destroyed.
In 2022, the social media app Snapchat was sued over an alleged violation of BIPA pertaining to the data collected from users who used features likes lenses and filters to take photos and videos of themselves. The company ultimately agreed to a $35 million settlement, according to the Rockford Register Star, a USA TODAY Network publication.
In the newer suit against Target, attorneys argued that the retail giant's stores across the country are outfitted with cameras and video surveillance, many of which have the capability of collecting biometric data. For at least a decade, Target has also made use of an "advanced system of electronic surveillance" at bases spread throughout the U.S., as well as two forensic labs, to "enhance video footage and analyze finger prints."
While the system is meant to detect shoplifters, the lawsuit contended that it captures any customer's face who enters the store.
"There are numerous instances of former Target employees detailing its facial recognition system circulating on the internet as well," the lawsuit said, referencing a TikTok page where customers and ex-employees discuss concerns about the system.
Amazon, Google, others also sued for biometric privacy concerns
Target is far from the first major American company to face legal action due to concerns over its biometric data collection practices
Last year, Amazon was hit with a class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to properly inform New York City customers of biometric information collection in Amazon Go stores. Amazon confirmed to USA TODAY that is used biometric data for its Amazon One "palm-based identity" payment system but denied using facial recognition technology in any of its stores.
In 2022, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Google, claiming the tech giant captured and used the state's residents' biometric data without their permission through products and services like Google Photos, Google Assistant and Nest Hub Max.
Contributing: Wyatte Grantham-Philips; Brett Molina;
Eric Lagatta covers breaking and trending news for USA TODAY. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
veryGood! (381)
Related
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Ranking MLB jersey advertisements: Whose patch is least offensive?
- Justice Department defends Boeing plea deal against criticism by 737 Max crash victims’ families
- Sofía Vergara reveals why she wanted to hide her curvy figure for 'Griselda' role
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Georgia mayor faces felony charges after investigators say he stashed alcohol in ditch for prisoners
- What Conservation Coalitions Have Learned from an Aspen Tree
- Jordan Chiles Breaks Silence on Significant Blow of Losing Olympic Medal
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Matthew Perry Investigation: At Least One Arrest Made in Connection to Actor's Death
Ranking
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Sanitation workers discover dead newborn boy inside Houston trash compactor
- US judge reopens $6.5 million lawsuit blaming Reno air traffic controllers for fatal crash in 2016
- Alabama lawyer accused of sexually assaulting handcuffed inmate, lawsuit says
- Don't let hackers fool you with a 'scam
- Wildfires are growing under climate change, and their smoke threatens farmworkers, study says
- Walmart boosts its outlook for 2024 with bargains proving a powerful lure for the inflation weary
- Alabama Supreme Court authorizes third nitrogen gas execution
Recommendation
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
Head of Theodore Roosevelt National Park departs North Dakota job
'My heart is broken': Litter of puppies euthanized after rabies exposure at rescue event
US judge reopens $6.5 million lawsuit blaming Reno air traffic controllers for fatal crash in 2016
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
In Mississippi, discovery of elephant fossil from the ice age provides window into the past
The Notebook Actress Gena Rowlands Dead at 94
Usher concert postponed hours before tour opener in Atlanta